i have elixir +8
c west serwer
only few FR on serwer
should i buy FR for me? 79 lvl atm soon 80
how many dmg give 1 flame ring for nova or 72lvl staff ..
This is a discussion on flame rings within the Class Questions and Tips forums, part of the Game Questions & Tips category; i have elixir +8
c west serwer
only few FR on serwer
should i buy FR for me? 79 lvl ...
Page: 1
i have elixir +8
c west serwer
only few FR on serwer
should i buy FR for me? 79 lvl atm soon 80
how many dmg give 1 flame ring for nova or 72lvl staff ..
it adds about 30 more damage w/ each flame ring with staff ^^
30 element NOT 30 damage.
in dcz my flame ring+1 upd my critical damage by about 200.
avg 100
um 1 ring doesnt add 200 damage....even +1 im with jdizzle flame ice and imiar rings add about 30-50 dmg per ring so with dual +0s youd probably hit a avg higer of about 70-80 damage at least thats how it was on my paper mage30 element NOT 30 damage.
in dcz my flame ring+1 upd my critical damage by about 200.
avg 100[/b]
pretty sure its at least a 100dmg boost
Using dual fr +2 and hellblood +8 vs using dual rols and hellblood +8
aoe:
with rols: 650-800 meteor damage
with fr's: 950-1300 meteor damage
Staff:
with rols: 450-600 ( 450 on warriors 600 on rouges)
with fr's +2: 700-950 ( 700 on warriors 850-950 onr ouges)
dunno about fr's +0 as i don't have any but fr's +2 help a lot!
Using dual fr +2 and hellblood +8 vs using dual rols and hellblood +8
aoe:
with rols: 650-800 meteor damage
with fr's: 950-1300 meteor damage
Staff:
with rols: 450-600 ( 450 on warriors 600 on rouges)
with fr's +2: 700-950 ( 700 on warriors 850-950 onr ouges)
dunno about fr's +0 as i don't have any but fr's +2 help a lot![/b]
well FR+2 and FR+0 is big difference, but i think FR+0 will give some extra dmg, not much but abit, i was light mage with dual imir+0 and it helped abit.
flame rings +0 help out tremendously, not just a bit lol :Pwell FR+2 and FR+0 is big difference, but i think FR+0 will give some extra dmg, not much but abit, i was light mage with dual imir+0 and it helped abit.[/b]
i did the calculations yesterday in arena vs a BP, i did 100 damage more with a flame ring using pillar ( was on my cousines noob account though) i tried another flame ring and i did 200 more average damage to the BP.
so i would calculate it this way... each 30 elemental (FR) = 100 more damage. (in PvP)
did not test on mobs yet.
Avarage damage bonus for FR+0 was 50 + -, according to my testing on friend in arena.
Pillar has too big of a damage range meaning that you really can't test it using pillar.i did the calculations yesterday in arena vs a BP, i did 100 damage more with a flame ring using pillar ( was on my cousines noob account though) i tried another flame ring and i did 200 more average damage to the BP.
so i would calculate it this way... each 30 elemental (FR) = 100 more damage. (in PvP)
did not test on mobs yet.[/b]
The actual way to test is was using Fire Staff so therefore it would give you a much preciser damage increase.
Pillar has too big of a damage range meaning that you really can't test it using pillar.
The actual way to test is was using Fire Staff so therefore it would give you a much preciser damage increase.[/b]
ignition and manes are best skills to test the damage. Each attack has very close damage... with 72 staff is ometimes hit 690 and other time 810 on same person...
igniton always goes like 540-535-545-540 etc... i'll never get 100 damage difference on same target with ignition. Same goes with manes but the marge is a bit bigger here.
ignition is also a good test, but i don't know what ur talking about for Fire Staff and such, it does happen like once in a while that the damage exceeds the +/- 50 range of the average, but it's usually pretty accurateignition and manes are best skills to test the damage. Each attack has very close damage... with 72 staff is ometimes hit 690 and other time 810 on same person...
igniton always goes like 540-535-545-540 etc... i'll never get 100 damage difference on same target with ignition. Same goes with manes but the marge is a bit bigger here.[/b]
Bookmarks