Fov +2 vs Roc +1

[toolbar]

i think fov+2

[Undeadkilla]

yea fov +2 for me

[Lokias]

one of each, think its more balanced that way tbh.

[sleven07]

I would switch the foverin's for the roc's in my opinion the only reason to get a foverin is because your either a cheap battle priest with +0's or cant afford a roc dual roc +1's are better due to the increase in hp. Hp is all that matters on a warrior past a certain point if you have +0 uniques or better your ac will be fine.

ur an idiot.. first of all he said foverin +2 vs roc +1

if u knew anything u would know that both rings give 10str, 10 health, so the only thing ur losing from not having a roc +1 is what 70hp?. and actually the foverin gives 48 ac vs 35 ac of the roc +1. so maybe instead of posting in a topic giving ur useless opinion just to raise ur post count u should think about what ur saying or at least look like what u know what ur talking about.. 70 hp is 1 "r" hit. however, that extra ac from the fov +2 is gonna be with u reducing damage all the time.

OT. foverin +2 deff over roc +1 but if u can get rocs +2 i would. maybe even sell both foverins +2, and try get a roc +2, and a roc +1?

[saul]

Dual FOVs+2 IMO

[sleven07]

I think a warrior should focus on str so I go with roc+1, not too much difference but a little bit more of str and flame resist which is not bad.

there is no str difference between roc +1 and foverin +2