Which ring is better for 60+ CZ and why?
This is a discussion on ROC+1 vs HV+2 in CZ? within the Class Questions and Tips forums, part of the Game Questions & Tips category; Which ring is better for 60+ CZ and why?...
Page: 1
Which ring is better for 60+ CZ and why?
my opinion hv+2>roc+1
hv+2 will have more str/hp and better resist than a +1 roc, but the hv2 has 16 less ac
The only downside is that I won't be able to use my rings on my dcz. At the moment, I have no interest in playing Ardream, though.
hv+2 are sexy roc+1 is good but meh
once you do go play in ard just get old rocs
just get u a roc+3 :P
hv +2 ftw. roc has better ac but hv 2 has more ap and health, warriors are the least attacked class in cz as it is
better use ROC+HV combination (even if it was ROC+2 vs HV+2) because of resists
HV+2 better for cz than well its way better for pk maybe abit worse in VS
so if u like to vs also u should get 1 of each
i think this is how it works roc+0<hv+1<roc+1<hv+2<roc+2<hv+3<roc+3
go for full str! dual dr3 dual mino3 wdn3 and sash of sorrows3! beast AP right there!
coz opal dont have hp and i think so does amulet of str. though amulet of curse hmmm also an awesome str accessory right there
well to be fair you did say FULL STR :P
but yea i know someone with a amulet of curse+4......sexy necklace
if you go full str your like a paper mage no hp and little defense i tried it out myself and it didnt go good
Bookmarks