ROC+1 vs HV+2 in CZ?

[Meeshka]

Which ring is better for 60+ CZ and why?

[Reaper66]

my opinion hv+2>roc+1
hv+2 will have more str/hp and better resist than a +1 roc, but the hv2 has 16 less ac

[Kallop]

my opinion hv+2>roc+1
hv+2 will have more str/hp and better resist than a +1 roc, but the hv2 has 22 less ac

This. Tho since when have warriors needed AC?

[Meeshka]

The only downside is that I won't be able to use my rings on my dcz. At the moment, I have no interest in playing Ardream, though.

[1manarmy]

hv+2 are sexy roc+1 is good but meh
once you do go play in ard just get old rocs

[Reaper66]

just get u a roc+3 :P

[StrongOne]

hv +2 ftw. roc has better ac but hv 2 has more ap and health, warriors are the least attacked class in cz as it is

[brutalsnake]

better use ROC+HV combination (even if it was ROC+2 vs HV+2) because of resists

[LostArrow]

HV+2 better for cz than well its way better for pk maybe abit worse in VS
so if u like to vs also u should get 1 of each

[theoneeeee]

i think this is how it works roc+0<hv+1<roc+1<hv+2<roc+2<hv+3<roc+3

[domey]

go for full str! dual dr3 dual mino3 wdn3 and sash of sorrows3! beast AP right there!

[Reaper66]

go for full str! dual dr3 dual mino3 wdn3 and sash of sorrows3! beast AP right there!

well if going for full ap why not change the dual mino+3s for dual opal earrings+3 and the wdn+3 for a amulet of str+3. all together thats 15 more str =)

[domey]

coz opal dont have hp and i think so does amulet of str. though amulet of curse hmmm also an awesome str accessory right there

[Reaper66]

well to be fair you did say FULL STR :P
but yea i know someone with a amulet of curse+4......sexy necklace

[theoneeeee]

if you go full str your like a paper mage no hp and little defense i tried it out myself and it didnt go good