I have a choice between these two and which would be best for a warrior
This is a discussion on String of skulls or skele belt? within the Class Questions and Tips forums, part of the Game Questions & Tips category; I have a choice between these two and which would be best for a warrior...
Page: 1
I have a choice between these two and which would be best for a warrior
strings of skulls ONLY if its +2 or higher.
skelly belt meh
a sos +1 is better then a skele even especially if u plan to + it up later on sos is an awsome belt had a +1 on my warrior and loved it =P
sos for warrior anyday! and as many said over it worths to upgrade it!
i would say, at +0 its useless.
at +1 its decent
Skeleton > sos at +0
for a warrior your always going to be better off going sos build, only way I see skelly being a more viable is for priests, who can get say a +2 skelly belt in merchant, over an IB/glass, and get a few high def stats on dagger, club, spear, and have their shield make up for lack of sword/axe/arrow def, those extra couple points for the price, combined with the ice def, make a skelly+2 for under the cost of an IB hard to pass up.
SB+0 > SOS+0
For warriors SOS+1 is a much better deal then SB+0, but with priests Sb may help better with AC.
Atm Sos is actually more expensive then SB just cuse people are going for +1 to +3
Well, if u are gonna keep it at +0 go skelly for sure. Also SoS is twice the price of SB on CW at least.
definitely sos better for warrior, skelly is more defensive,
string of skulls only if its +1 otherwise go with skele
still SoS+1 would be overpriced comparing it to Skelly at +0
dont go SoS unless +2/+3
go skelly and upgrade your other uniques !!
if u take SOS+0 over SB+0,
u gain 5hp...,but u lost 20ac
u gain 5str now u hit more dmg, but wait u lost 5 wep def, so u get hit for more
o yea u also lost 200m coins , strike three !
dont think about sos below +2 imo
Bookmarks