Lets say someone accuses u of stealing a wallet but he has no evidence what so ever that link u to the crime... till he shows some proof, ure considered innocent... there can be no doubt tht u stole the wallet unless there is some evidence...
ure theory is based on a a doubt that other might have... Since he made this topic, some people will have 2nd thought about J now untill this topics gets to an conclusion... but still the fact remains u cant consider someone guilty until u show some evidence... no evidence = not a scammer
Bookmarks