I intended not to post again but you continue to respond which makes sense, as I last responded to you.
Let us therefore agree to disagree, perhaps when you are a bit more knowledgable and willing to see outside your own viewpoint (ie: others don't assume you are telling the truth because you say so), you will understand the difference between what is obviously true to you, and what is needed to convince others in a public setting. Regardless of your claims, postings of this thread were taken into consideration, quoted in points, and more or less clearly pointed out by myself and to some degree by others: that though you claim to have contacts who provided you with specific information, and have heard or overseen things happening, nothing was actually presented here to back up this claim above what is in fact hearsay on your part. You can claim up and down that you are responsible and your words should be taken seriously, it does not prove a thing. It also would not include evidence after I made each of my points, that would only be you answering mine and others request to provide evidence, as we requested. For people who read this curiously, and wanted something to show this is more then just a story, that they should have drawn your ire with such request is strange in my opinion, as it is a sensible request.
I find it humorous that your consider me "using vague opinion", "over exaggerating ", "not looking or taking into consideration the entire post" because I pointed the above out to you. If I missed evidence you pointed out when I originally posted what I did, please show me and I will admit that I did not take consideration the entire post
till that point and well after. Evidence does not include a certain turkish person you knew for 3 years and told you this which is unamed, a duper running around merching everything at half price over and over with no frap or name listed, that your friend had an item wiped and so it must have been a duper, or anything else of second hand nature. All of these were assertions on your part, nothing more. Which once again does not hold up to public scrutiny. It is striking to me that in my choosing to point this out to you, you found this logic faulty.
My claim was not that you were lying, untrustworthy, or otherwise malicious in your intent, or even that there is no dupe process going on in your servor or others. You may be fully aware that this is infact going on. I and some others simply wanted substantiation. You chose to take exception for me pointing out the lack thereof, verywell.
If I offended you my apologies. I neither know you and suppose we have wasted both our times here posting back and forth. I would however suggest one more thing. That you look up the definition of the word moronic, which is defined as an especially stupid person. Or psychologically: of mild mental retardation, that of a 7 to 12 year old child. If you wish to disagree with my points feel free to do so. If you wish to use vulgarities to strengthen your points, than so be it as well.[/b]
Bookmarks