best pendant for assasin lvl 80

[aligator]

but wouldn't be that 27 wp's + risk of burning them way more expensive than a sinlge IN?

[schrotti]

but wouldn't be that 27 wp's + risk of burning them way more expensive than a sinlge IN?[/b]

its 100% to +3?

and no, WP+3 is by far cheaper and better than IN+0, hence why I said IN is overrated.

[cachorro]

people still voting wp

i see alot of warrior pendants +0 cheap in merchant now .. .. :lol:

[NaidenZ]

pp+5 ? xD
Priest Pendant +5 60 35 INT 18 STR 35 DEX 350 MP 40MR 40PR 40CR h34r:

[SilentDaemon]

its 100% to +3

[alper15]

pp+3/wp+3 > IN...

[lez]

in+3>in+2>in+1/wp+3>in+0>wp+2>ep+3>pp+3>wp+1>ep+2>pp+2>wp+0>ep+1> pp+1>ep>pp
my scale ^^

[japo]

WP+3, more hp, more mana, more resistances, more def, more ap..

IN is overrated tbh.[/b]

wp+3 is after IN, the ac boost u need for compare to a IN... is much more than a shitty wp

and i think WP+PP+3, on a lvl 80 sin u dont need more ap^^ u just need hp/def

the more hp/def u have... better if u are skilled, unskilled player will choose Dex bonus

[aligator]

its 100% to +3?[/b]

wtf.. didn't know that h34r:
since when?

[Steefo_o]

always
i would take wp+3 imo

[OuchDidThatHurt]

It really defends on the situation: Attacking mages: use WP
Others: use IN

[Helseth]

lvl 80 sin needs resistances? lol h34r:

[japo]

lvl 80 sin needs resistances? lol h34r:[/b]

magic shield isnt enough? xD

IN shitt isnt hard to understand... u cant kill a lvl 80 skilled and geared warrior/rogue unless u use IN (most of the times)

[s0ft]

its 100% to +3?

and no, WP+3 is by far cheaper and better than IN+0, hence why I said IN is overrated.[/b]

In ares wp+3 are alot more than IN+0

[Many]

its 100% to +3?

and no, WP+3 is by far cheaper and better than IN+0, hence why I said IN is overrated.[/b]

Actually WP +3 would cost more then twice as much as IN+0(atleast according Edana prices)