Free lvl 72 char+items for the one who knows tha answer

[emosexual]

*Cough* You got owned edited his post =p, check guy below mine cos he quoted him.. zuhahaha =p

[FluB]

Originally posted by Haxium+--><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Haxium)</div>

<!--QuoteBegin-FluB

1. Suppose there is some natural number which cannot be
unambiguously described in fourteen words or less.

2. Then there must be a smallest such number. Let's call it n.

3. But now n is "the smallest natural number that cannot be
unambiguously described in fourteen words or less".

4. This is a complete and unambiguous description of n in
fourteen words, contradicting the fact that n was
supposed not to have such a description!

5. Since the assumption (step 1) of the existence of a natural
number that can't be unambiguously described in fourteen words
or less led to a contradiction, it must be an incorrect assumption.

6. Therefore, all natural numbers can be unambiguously
described in fourteen words or less!


char plz

gg googling it [/b]

bless the internet!

there were no rules that I couldn't google it

[YouGotOwned]

Originally posted by emosexual
*Cough* You got owned edited his post =p, check guy below mine cos he quoted him.. zuhahaha =p

shhhh dont say it :lol: anyway I dont think that your answer is good cause otherwise, you would have the account info but you dont

[emosexual]

Or it could just all be a hoax =p

[FluB]

Originally posted by Artemise
1. Suppose there is some natural number which cannot be *
unambiguously described in fourteen words or less. *

2. Then there must be a smallest such number. Let's call it n. *

3. But now n is "the smallest natural number that cannot be *
unambiguously described in fourteen words or less". *

4. This is a complete and unambiguous description of n in *
fourteen words, contradicting the fact that n was *
supposed not to have such a description! *

5. Since the assumption (step 1) of the existence of a natural *
number that can't be unambiguously described in fourteen words *
or less led to a contradiction, it must be an incorrect assumption. *

6. Therefore, all natural numbers can be unambiguously *
described in fourteen words or less! *

im sorry, but thats not a number....

but that states there isn't any answer to your question, you asked the smallest word that can be discribed in 20 words, but every natural number is written in max. fourteen words or less

[CheeseIsGood]

111,111,111,111,111,111

[0bscuritY]

rofl artemise ?!
if you dont have nothing to do with your character
gyft it to me :wub:

[robintjeuh]

69 can be described by many things

... i win?

[Flippy]

21 121 121 121

[ultimaliaz]

100,000,000,000,000,000

[Artemise]

not every question has an answer...
Your post, while true, is not the right answer...

[Flippy]

<_<

[Shurt]

So there is no answer? Not exactly seeing how this was a good test of intelligence for the potential new user of your account lol.

Oh well, I'll chime in for the $100, the answer is there is none. Impossible.

[IIStunnerII]

Originally posted by Shurt
So there is no answer? Not exactly seeing how this was a good test of intelligence for the potential new user of your account lol.

Oh well, I'll chime in for the $100, the answer is there is none. Impossible.

If the answer is "there s no such thing" then i win ;D

[FluB]

Originally posted by Artemise
not every question has an answer...
Your post, while true, is not the right answer...

:blink: my post said there is no natural number that cannot be discribed in 14 words or less, And if you say my post is true then you say there is no answer to your question.
So you are just messing with us and you won't ever give your account away or I wan't to know the answer and get an account