Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 67

Interesting Hole in K2 TOS

This is a discussion on Interesting Hole in K2 TOS within the General Chat forums, part of the Knight Online (ko4life.com) category; problem is, how many people actually will come to california to get $5 back?...
Page: 3


  1. #31
    aka Manipulation Senior Member KungPaoChicken's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    1,702

    Default

    problem is, how many people actually will come to california to get $5 back?

  2. #32
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    TEXAS , USA 1337
    Posts
    1,284

    Default

    no shit @ the gay replies.

    i don't have anything better to do atm because the hackers have taken over my game. so either contribute to the thread or gtfo.

    i get a warn and a 2 day ban for calling trialmod3 chuckie and they can flame me like this?

    lol @ ko4life
    (vote no on trial mod 3 btw - i think he is chuckie even though phantom and shurt assure me that he is not.)
    back to the topic at hand -

    @nikleo the reason private suggests using the cdca or whatever is that you don't have to pay for any of that - you are filing a complaint with the people that are paid by the state to protect the rights of the consumer.

    btw, you don't need a lawyer to take them to small claims 10000 times.[/b]
    sounded like you had something larger in mind thats why i wrote what i wrote

  3. #33
    Senior Member wiseman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    318

    Default

    holychit.... Your amazing xD
    If there is anything i can do to help let me know. I'm not the greatest at research and junk, but anything i'd be able to do, i'd sure do it.

  4. #34
    Hustlin' Senior Member kgllegend's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Posts
    619

    Default

    You should really go through with this idea, it would really help make a large difference in the game. If KO can acknowledge that people are really trying to do take legal actions against what they are doing, I am sure that even if they won the case they would make adjustments and create a solution to this problem in game, because they know that eventually a second case would be brought up against them by someone else. Only problem is it is very expensive. If only this forum can accept donations for thing's like this.

  5. #35
    420 Senior Member karysa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    LoVin the GanJa since '92
    Posts
    947

    Default

    ud have to argue that they ARENT working, which they do...theyre just being used improperly, but they still FUNCTION properly

    thats like making a lawsuit cuz ur toaster is burning all ur toast, but at the same time its only being burnt cuz everytime u put toast in ur friend puts it on the highest heat setting.....

    toaster is working, its just not being used properly...thats not the company's fault thats the users fault[/b]
    It's more like buying toast at a restaurant that would be guarunteed to cook properly and not be burned. Yet someone 'doesnt matter who' keeps burning, but the restaurant still serves it to you burnt.

    I remember along time ago (3~4 years) they promised new zones that only premuim users could go to.. Haven't seen that yet.[/b]
    Lol, it's called 'server 1'.

  6. #36
    Senior Member Private's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    3,342

    Default

    california department of consumer affairs

    and wat is up with karysa sig ??????????

  7. #37
    420 Senior Member karysa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    LoVin the GanJa since '92
    Posts
    947

    Default

    california department of consumer affairs

    and wat is up with karysa sig ??????????[/b]
    What exactly is wrong with it?

  8. #38
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Kansas City
    Posts
    2,603

    Default

    california department of consumer affairs

    and wat is up with karysa sig ??????????[/b]
    Looks fine to me...

  9. #39
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Argentina, not Mexico
    Posts
    2,532

    Default

    Personally I find it quite disrespectful, Magic and Karysa.

    Btw, first posters really shut up, he's actually trying to do something. I think you clearly have a case, just needs some planning and go for it.

  10. #40
    BigApple
    Guest

    Default

    OKay , so you are comparing scrolls to a consumer goods item like a tv. Lets examine that theory...
    I buy a TV and take it home, set it up, and it works great. Just like using a scroll...
    Then a crackhead comes in and smashes my nice new TV. Just like a hacker cancelling your scroll.
    The TV seller/manufacturer has no liability via their warranty as it is not a malfunction of the TV itself, but a result of illegal activity by a third party. K2's would have no liability as it is not a malfunction of the scroll itself, but also is a result of illegal activity by a third party.
    (Now if the scrolls just disappeared on thereown you would have a strong case).
    I think you would have to sue the hackers for denial of service or something like that.

    This is just my talking point, so please dont flame me. I think the current situation sucks, but I don't think you can actually sue them, for this. Although it is likely that if you bring a suit, they will make you a settlement offer.

  11. #41
    PaPaSmurF
    Guest

    Default

    It's more like buying toast at a restaurant that would be guarunteed to cook properly and not be burned. Yet someone 'doesnt matter who' keeps burning, but the restaurant still serves it to you burnt.
    Lol, it's called 'server 1'. [/b]
    lol touche :lol:

  12. #42
    420 Senior Member karysa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    LoVin the GanJa since '92
    Posts
    947

    Default

    OKay , so you are comparing scrolls to a consumer goods item like a tv. Lets examine that theory...
    I buy a TV and take it home, set it up, and it works great. Just like using a scroll...
    Then a crackhead comes in and smashes my nice new TV. Just like a hacker cancelling your scroll.
    The TV seller/manufacturer has no liability via their warranty as it is not a malfunction of the TV itself, but a result of illegal activity by a third party. K2's would have no liability as it is not a malfunction of the scroll itself, but also is a result of illegal activity by a third party.
    (Now if the scrolls just disappeared on thereown you would have a strong case).
    I think you would have to sue the hackers for denial of service or something like that.

    This is just my talking point, so please dont flame me. I think the current situation sucks, but I don't think you can actually sue them, for this. Although it is likely that if you bring a suit, they will make you a settlement offer.[/b]
    Yes, but *I* am responsible for the security of my home, to stop crackheads from breaking my TV. K2 is responsible for the security of their servers(home) to stop crackheads(hackers) from breaking the tv(scrolls).

  13. #43
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    129

    Default

    OKay , so you are comparing scrolls to a consumer goods item like a tv. Lets examine that theory...
    I buy a TV and take it home, set it up, and it works great. Just like using a scroll...
    Then a crackhead comes in and smashes my nice new TV. Just like a hacker cancelling your scroll.
    The TV seller/manufacturer has no liability via their warranty as it is not a malfunction of the TV itself, but a result of illegal activity by a third party. K2's would have no liability as it is not a malfunction of the scroll itself, but also is a result of illegal activity by a third party.
    (Now if the scrolls just disappeared on thereown you would have a strong case).
    I think you would have to sue the hackers for denial of service or something like that.

    This is just my talking point, so please dont flame me. I think the current situation sucks, but I don't think you can actually sue them, for this. Although it is likely that if you bring a suit, they will make you a settlement offer.[/b]
    not exactly because we never get to take the scrolls home. we aren't allowed to. we have to use them on k2s servers (in their store) and the hacker ruins them on their property so they are responsible for letting the hacker do so.

    its not about winning a a lawsuit - its about getting their attention. if every californian that plays this game filed a small claims action it would cost nothing to finance and a buttload of time on their part to respond.

  14. #44
    Nissim
    Guest

    Default

    Like barny stinson says: Lawsuit UP! :P

    nice idea.. but i dont think u will get anything out of this.

  15. #45
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    129

    Default

    Like barny stinson says: Lawsuit UP! :P

    nice idea.. but i dont think u will get anything out of this.[/b]

    jebus - what is wrong with just having a discussion about something . . . i thought this was a forum where people shared ideas.

    nevermind i guess . . .

Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •