k2 stole my money

[Stronger]

I didn't read any of it because I know it is going to be stupid. I just wanted you to know that.[/b]

It was an intelligent rebuttal, was well researched and seemed to make sense of the whole matter in my opinion.

[tommyleonghk]

Cleatus 1 - 0 moemoneyman

h34r:

back to topic

K2 will do anything they like as long as you've agreed with their TOS and they can ammend their TOS anytime anyday whenever they feel like it... end of story...

[lovel12345]

GG
goodluck on getting ur money its k2 xD

[killer2675]

for everytime i heard k2 stole my money, help i would be a millionaire

btw my friend had same prob and k2 refused to give money back.. and this credit card he used e only used on the internet so he said someone got his info and he said it was stolen ang got all his money back... so just try to lie..


Off topic:

There is really no need for name calling.

There is an old saying that goes something like "It is better to have said nothing and be thought a fool, than to have spoken and let it be known." I know how you'll react due to the fact you're quite immature, but the truth of the matter in this case is that the previous statement is addressed toward you.

This is the second time you've jumped on my post like you had something to prove. This is the second time you've been wrong. The next time you go skimming through google in an effort to flame someone I highly recommend you read through the entire context of your source.

When a definition is provided including the text "Reasonably certain" or "reasonably acceptable", the intent suggests that the terms be definite - or that - the parties involved and members of the court can clearly ascertain the terms of the agreement. Essentially, to utilize your model "Bubba will give stuff to you" is not reasonably agreeable "Bubba will deliver 1 gold bar in exchange for 3 widgets you will provide to Bubba" is reasonably certain. In the first sentence, it is not reasonable to determine what bubba will provide you with, where as in the second it is quite clear. The second validates the offer and allows the parties to enter into Agreement.

Now, to be more correct - terms of an agreement must be LAWFUL and MORALLY ACCEPTABLE. You would have been correct on that one, but that's not what you said, in either case it would be grabbing at straws to suggest this is an uncouth practice.

Addressing the next comment, the one where you slobber all over yourself and forget yet again, the context of the situation therefore confirming your status as a common dullard:



Let's pretend Zywar opened his account over a year ago. "By clicking submit you agree to the terms and conditions and the EULA" type notice on the KOL website. The EULA cleverly refers back to about every legal document the company has available. I am sorry I don't care enough to look back but if you challenge me I will to further prove your intellectual laziness; one of these documents ( I know because I saw it the other night before I wrote it.. hint hint ) clearly states these terms are subject to change without notice. When Zywar accepted the original terms, he accepted the responsibility to stay informed of T&C changes. ((By the way, and pardon the stream of consciousness, this does in fact happen all the time. The difference between your model of the bank and the company in question- K2, is that banks will send you a little pamphlet in the mail to read. I assume this difference is due to the fact the bank's business is not 100% web driven like that of K2 Networks. It is your responsibility to read through the contract living service agreements, not the service providers to spoon feed you)) In the event that Zywar's account was opened prior to the introduction of re-occurring payment options, he was notified to check for updates So last month when he purchased the goods or services from K2, he did agree to these terms and had the opportunity to be informed. When you purchase something, you automatically agree to the conditions of the sale, without prejudice. AHA!!! Now, that's a completely DIFFERENT topic all together. I won't even attempt to speak on this.. I know you won't get it. Quick, go to google.. type in "without prejudice", read 3 lines and come back claiming to have a clue!

In summary, I am still correct and you have once again proven to be just itching to win an e-fight. You will never "win" anything so long as you act like such a fool. Try having a conversation instead of being a cheese about it. I rarely post anything anymore, and when I do, I'm only trying to be helpful. When someone says "hey I've got a problem" and the rest of you go on about "you retard, stupid mofo dumbass" you've blown it. I'm trying to help and provide a little more substance than just "Fuck K2" With that said, I'm certainly not perfect and have been wrong a time or two. I would love to learn something new if you've got something to teach me... but with your futile attempts to be insulting you've only portrayed yourself as a person who's argument is not worthy of consideration. If I make an incorrect statement when trying to be helpful, provide a clarification - I'll admit if I'm not correct. At the end of the day, in your haste to be "cool" you've failed at proving my information inaccurate. You should really try a different approach. You might find you could actually have a valid statement if you weren't in such a hurry to be right.

I'll say nothing further on the topic. Say what you want, I have nothing to prove to one such as yourself. I'll look forward to your convulsions of idiocy the next time I try to offer up some food for thought.

Love,

Cleatus[/b]

write a damn book plz?

[kozyb]

for everytime i heard k2 stole my money, help i would be a millionaire

btw my friend had same prob and k2 refused to give money back.. and this credit card he used e only used on the internet so he said someone got his info and he said it was stolen ang got all his money back... so just try to lie..
Off topic:

write a damn book plz?[/b]

hmm depends on what credit card company are we talk about.
my credit card is also only for the internet.
but i don't think i can say that because they can check the bills and find out the truth.

also i never had problem with k2 before when i did premium in 2006 and 2007. this is just whole this new system drive me crazy.

[moemoneyman]

hmm depends on what credit card company are we talk about.
my credit card is also only for the internet.
but i don't think i can say that because they can check the bills and find out the truth.

also i never had problem with k2 before when i did premium in 2006 and 2007. this is just whole this new system drive me crazy.[/b]

I told you, call your credit card company, tell them that you were not aware that there was recurring billing, and that you only found out about it after you tried to purchase something. Also tell them that you tried to contact K2 but they refused to give you your money back. They will open up a dispute, and then in 5 days they will mail you a testimonial form. You fill out the testimonial form and then mail it back. After that they try and contact K2 and present them with your testimony. More than likely, you will win the dispute. This process is the same for every credit card company (in the United States atleast).

Unless you actually did use up the benefit of their premium service - like using up knight cash, you are not at fault.

The same thing happened to me with Amazon. They have this thing called Amazon Prime. Since I bought over 100 dollars worth of books from Amazon, they gave me an option to sign up for Amazon Prime free for 3 months. I had no clue that there was recurring billing (or automatic billing in this case) after the free trial period was over. I found out that they charged my account with 70 dollars. I contacted my credit card company, explained what happened and they refunded the money.

Don't let idiots like Calius give you wrong advice. This has nothing to do with "capitalism" or "pitfall of commerce". You are not doing anything illegal.

[Uzu]

DO WHAT MOE SAIS

[moemoneyman]

Cleatus>moemoneyman...
sry moe but ur argumentation only sucks. i may call u an idiot.[/b]

That is awesome. Let me take a moment of my time to care.

[Felix]

Please just read my sig.

[assassinofthemist]

Please just read my sig.[/b]

lol i knew u were gona say that

[Rad_Archer]

Oh, and:

[/b]

Damn beat me to it...

[tompsu]

Replace "Bitch" for "K2" and "Fish" for "Money" and you could be the little kid

h34r:[/b]

LMAO