Was wondering if rougue's can still be as good as before the newest expansion without some sort of mh abuse. Or do warriors have now the bennefit of this expansion?
This is a discussion on The best class at FF expansion within the General Chat forums, part of the Knight Online (ko4life.com) category; Was wondering if rougue's can still be as good as before the newest expansion without some sort of mh abuse. ...
Page: 1
Was wondering if rougue's can still be as good as before the newest expansion without some sort of mh abuse. Or do warriors have now the bennefit of this expansion?
priest.
Was wondering if rougue's can still be as good as before the newest expansion without some sort of mh abuse. Or do warriors have now the bennefit of this expansion?[/b]
i believe no class can be considered the best its just the player
Priest is kind of weak to compare in the best classes, as you will think duffing and healing is kind of fair. A warrior wins a priest with equal gear when priest doesn't duff nor heal.
This is pretty objective. mages are weaker as warrior, that's a fact. There's always a class that's a little better then the other one.i believe no class can be considered the best its just the player[/b]
Priest is kind of weak to compare in the best classes, as you will think duffing and healing is kind of fair. A warrior wins a priest with equal gear when priest doesn't duff nor heal.[/b]
the whats the point of begin a priest? should have just been a warrior lol
if a priest doesnt debuff a warrior hes a idiot
If a priest debuffs a warrior in a vs then the priest's just a retarted fag.
not if he only uses malice, its fair in my opion....
lol at priest not allowed to use skills .............priest is cool
even with equal gear warriors have more ac, more hp, and more ap....whats the point vsing if priests dont use duffs?If a priest debuffs a warrior in a vs then the priest's just a retarted fag.[/b]
.here we go again -.-[/b]
Correction.If a priest debuffs a warrior in a vs then the priest's just a retarted fag.[/b]
If a priest doesnt malice a warrior he's a stupid player and not worth playing priest.
Warrior got more ac/hp/mana/ap then a normal priest
God hell, you sound like an avarage Turk.
You sound like one if you find a priest can debuff in a VS. That's just dumb, from all VS'es I've seen in the past. Priest vs warriors and rougues, and they got out pretty well without noob duffing. And in this topic I was more pointing to warrior or rougue, not priest.Correction.
If a priest doesnt malice a warrior he's a stupid player and not worth playing priest.
Warrior got more ac/hp/mana/ap then a normal priest
God hell, you sound like an avarage Turk.[/b]
If a priest does malice a warrior he's a stupid player and not worth playing priest.
priest gets more ac/hp/mana/ap then a duffed warrior
not to mention heals....how many can u cancel..
God hell, you sound like an avarage Turk.
whats the point of using heals when vsing a warrior ?If a priest does malice a warrior he's a stupid player and not worth playing priest.
priest gets more ac/hp/mana/ap then a duffed warrior
not to mention heals....how many can u cancel..
God hell, you sound like an avarage Turk.[/b]
the warrior have no chance killing the priest that way
Bookmarks