IN vs PP+3 or IN vs WP +2

[Dark3lf]

For PK I'd use IN. You will always need weapon def because lvl 80 characters with +9/+3 items are just popping out of nowhere =D

[pax_bar]

for what you need wp hp or mana for 80 lvl sin.. ?

[Luigi]

hp+mana+resists+dex

[pax_bar]

rog 80 lvl dont ned more hp mana i think..

[Mario]

for sins wp+3>IN>WP+2[/b]

WP+3 price = IN+1 (or more), so i would take IN+1 still

[G0D]

Talia > all :lol:

[The_Guardian]

IN > WP > pp

[V3ndetta]

i'd take WP+2 over IN or pp+3.
wp+2 its 28def, much more hp/mana then IN, giving u also AP,resistens.

[Sustain]

PP +3 >IN, IN>WP+2

PP+3 > IN > WP +2

AP> all.

[Painf00l]

As most have said, it depends on your playing style. However if you have reasonable gear and are lvl 80, a tiny amount of ac/hp/ap wouldnt have as big effect as + 10 all wep defence imo.

[japo]

pp+3 is the best neck for an archer
for sins wp+3>IN>WP+2[/b]

If u talk about wp+3... why not IN+1 right?

IN+1 will pwn all, no matter class...

[poiz3n]

wp+2 better for xp on sin , in is good for pking

[KaZaM]

why would a lvl 80 want to exp? :P

[poiz3n]

why would a lvl 80 want to exp? :P[/b]

ill post u a ss why xD

[GetRichOrDieTrying]

i would use pp+3 for critical point damages