IN vs PP+3 or IN vs WP +2

[pax_bar]

1st lvl 80 rog dont need HP ....

he need ac > ap than .................hp...

[H0RROR]

IN all the way, it's the most expensive necklace for a reason.

[pax_bar]

IN is good when you go vs wwith warrior or bp ...



for sin you just need keep your fast minor and need also high ap in my opinion ....

[Flam3_Arch3r]

1st lvl 80 rog dont need HP ....

he need ac > ap than .................hp...[/b]

but health bonus adds mana aswell, and more mana=more minor heals...
and those that said if u can get wp+3 then u can get IN+1, i still think wp+3 would be better, maybe the 12 defence abillity to all weapons is better than the 32 or whatever defence wp+3 has, but not that better, and wp+3 has more hp aswell, RESISTS and more dex/str which i think is better than the loss of that weapon defences, especially if u have IB/GB.

[Aba]

IN > all for pk


but it would be nice to have a pp+3 for critical pointing people. PP+3 not even close to being worth using over IN in pk though. WP+2/3 maybe...gives more HP than IN - but tbh the AP/HP/AC/Resists doesn't make up for the 10 weapon defence, at all.

[Roberto]

IN for mages and Int.prist

WP+2 for warrior amd rougs and BP

If they knwo how to use it on right way.

[pax_bar]

about sin vs sin...


you dont need a lot of hp/ mp ( mp mayby you need but 1k mp more is just 600hp its not a big deall..)
you just need make good combo and drink fast mp pots...

[akutee]

pp3 if ur archer, wp2 if ur sin with good gears, IN if u have crap def gears

[oceano]

IN ftw, more wep defense never hurt

[Rad_Archer]

As an Archer I use PP and IN but as a sin I'd use the WP and IN...

[Taeho]

I Use PP and IN on my sin , However WP+2/3 i wouldn't mind using at all.

[KaZaM]

Hmm, if they think that AP> all, then, they're dumb and have no clue on how to play this game.

AP is so overrated.
also, how does being lvl 80 prove that you know how to play?
Maybe(Not maybe) Those people who did the 1v1's suck balls at this game.[/b]

You couldn't get their HP down to 95% I'm 100% sure lol.
I guess being lvl 80, and a top PKer in one of the oldest version of Knight Online where everyone is high lvl'd with decent items is nothing, they suck at the game... sure..

[Chemical]

You couldn't get their HP down to 95% I'm 100% sure lol.
I guess being lvl 80, and a top PKer in one of the oldest version of Knight Online where everyone is high lvl'd with decent items is nothing, they suck at the game... sure..[/b]

lol, I'm sure you are pretty wrong lol.
I have played japko and I wasnt too impressed.

Oh and since you think you know japko, well you don't. Japko has different items then USKO.

[Cecilia]

You couldn't get their HP down to 95% I'm 100% sure lol.
I guess being lvl 80, and a top PKer in one of the oldest version of Knight Online where everyone is high lvl'd with decent items is nothing, they suck at the game... sure..[/b]

I've played JPKO and 50% of the items are completely different than in USKO. A lot of the items in JPKO are users submitted items that won the prize and had their item implemented. Comparing JPKO with USKO is like comparing apples/oranges. And in USKO I can 1000% assure you ap is the least important attribute to a warrior you will never top out at 4k ap on USKO without full +10 gear and +3 and higher uniques while maintaining those levels of ac/hp.

[Ainelover]

Kazam aka Norbi played jpko like 3 weeks and think their are gods :P - E-PENIS +10 <3