Who agrees 70 cap was better than 80?

**DannyTheMan** · 08-02-2007, 06:25 PM

Compounding uniques really fucked this game 5 ways to hell (+1, +2, +3, +4, and +5) It used to be that anyone had a chance with +9 accessories: now it's possible for a duper to get so far ahead that no one has a chance of beating them unless they are of similar gear.[/b]

Agreed!

A +9 STR ring wasnt much worse than a ROC +0 as the STR increase countered the def... now a ROC +1 (easy on Ares) is same as a +14/3Ring... crazy

_timton · 08-02-2007, 06:44 PM

Who agrees 70 cap was better than 80?[/b]

I agree.

KO was fun : Lvl 70 cap, and mostly noob items
KE was also fun : Lvl 70 cap, and some better items
RoFD was fun in the beginning : Lvl 80 cap, quest accessories, free shell, free chitin, 1000 exp quests
"New moradon" and further on will suck : Lvl 90? JPKO items? combo dolls.

My opinion.

**Lethal** · 08-02-2007, 07:54 PM

DONT ANSWER THIS ><

i dont want know what lv90 attack warrior gets..

[/b]

lvl 90 warrior skill = death... 1-hit kill

and i liked the 70 cap better even though i hafta admit that the new skills are worth achieving and the 59 dcz cap expansion is more fun as well.

Judas Iscariot · 08-02-2007, 09:25 PM

Heh, deep down inside I know almost no one really wants to exp to 80. Ardream is getting to be so popular cause unless you were already +65 when rofd came, you weren't gonna stand a chance in the exp race (without sharing accounts). The 80 cap should've been implemented when the servers had a higher population of 65+ players.

One trick to lure more players to cz is to just reduce the total levels... give a lvl 30 the stats/skills of a lvl 60, and make it max like lvl 50, but make it in a way where you have a slight decrease in total exp needed.

kyle_001 · 08-02-2007, 11:24 PM

na 80 is much better gives game more chanlleng

**Psy** · 08-03-2007, 12:45 AM

na 80 is much better gives game more chanlleng[/b]

It's not that it gets more challenging, it's that it gets more BORING!!!!
The only challenge is avoiding real life encounters in order to level your virtual character.
I've been leveling on Girakon for the past few days killing Apos, i can't stand to kill those things for 2 hours straight without doing something else. Luckily, the XP Nazi allows me to lure over obos for the party to kill, giving us 10 minutes of thrill and excitement.

**rodinamo** · 08-03-2007, 12:50 AM

60-70 took more time imo than 70-80 if u think about it

KE u had to kill a lot of cz trolls whiel getting raided non stop
now rofd u need about 3 months of dark stones

**aligator** · 08-03-2007, 04:45 AM

lets calculate the stats of a 90 warrior and then close the topic

will it be 255/255? ><

Misanthrope · 08-03-2007, 10:35 AM

lets calculate the stats of a 90 warrior and then close the topic

will it be 255/255? ><[/b]

I think it's 255/212 -- too lazy to look it up - but at 80 it's like 255/162 (I think) so with 10 lvls and 5 points-per-lvl -- that'd be 255/212h

Terrorblade · 08-03-2007, 11:17 AM

60-70 took more time imo than 70-80 if u think about it

KE u had to kill a lot of cz trolls whiel getting raided non stop
now rofd u need about 3 months of dark stones[/b]

I dissagree

at least making lvl 65 was kinda easy for me and I didnt have to play 24/7 to achieve it. And this lvl was enough to stand against lvl 70 chars. But in ROFD I'm not able to get 75 without help. Yet after ROFD u have to put stat points in HP which means everyone can stand more than in the past. Warriors get a nice advantage from this and so tank priests.

As I said ... ROFD kinda ruined PK ... In CZ there are only two situations: Orcs camping before HB and humans camping before OB.

**aligator** · 08-03-2007, 11:23 AM

I think it's 255/212 -- too lazy to look it up - but at 80 it's like 255/162 (I think) so with 10 lvls and 5 points-per-lvl -- that'd be 255/212h[/b]

lol.. lv90 with howlingsword and defenseskilled...

:blink:

sn3aky · 08-03-2007, 12:37 PM

In the new Moradon patch there is supposed to be a lvl 60-69 CZ so I dont know what you all are complaining about, I think we should complain about it AFTER the 60-69 CZ doesn't come(or K2 screws it up by making it on 123(4) servers.

Aba · 08-03-2007, 01:36 PM

60-69 cz would suck...really bad. Only 70+ in cz? that's only like 60% of the people who pk. O_o I liked it better in KE when there was only pk on d1. No ardream. Only once a week DLW.

THAT was pk. Although it was harder cuz more people camping base, more 8 man parties running bowl, it was fun.