IN+0 or WP+1?

[sunman]

for a lvl 62 warrior which is better? current stats is 2.6k hp, 1.6k ap, 1031 def unbuffed.

[Holy]

on lvl 62 I think WP+1 would be better. But thats me

[The_Real_PlodeZ]

IN for PK, WP +1 for everything else.

[N1GG4]

Originally posted by The_Real_PlodeZ
IN for PK, WP +1 for everything else.

+1

[DontBanMe]

for everything else there is mastercard.

[xourico]

IN all the way <_<

IN+0> WP+1 even for exp <_<

IN= same AP almost, more HP and more MANA
WP= same ap almost, less HP less mana, and 20 ac ^_^

[sunman]

in doens't give mana.. only str and hp

[Elrohir]

Originally posted by sunman
in doens't give mana.. only str and hp

HP points = mana for warriors and rogues

[Aba]

well it depends pk or exp and leveling up or not? I'd go IN if you're looking for future use, if not. WP is nice for fukkin around..

[wraith86]

you have 1031 AC unbuffed at 62? thats what my 67 warrior has buffed

[rodinamo]

you have 1031 AC unbuffed at 62? thats what my 67 warrior has buffed

1031 def at 67 is puthetic.... lemme guess ur one of those berserk nubs <_<

[Vacant]

Originally posted by rodinamo

you have 1031 AC unbuffed at 62? thats what my 67 warrior has buffed

1031 def at 67 is puthetic.... lemme guess ur one of those berserk nubs <_<

Pathetic? Stop hatin people that work hard enough for the gear they have. Just because your a higher lvl doesent automatically give you dual rocs dual we skelly and in. <_<

[TripleOG4life]

Originally posted by Vacant
Just because your a higher lvl doesent automatically give you dual rocs dual we skelly and in. *<_<

i wish it were like that. i would actually be motivated to lvl but its not so... IN pls

[Josh]

Originally posted by rodinamo

you have 1031 AC unbuffed at 62? thats what my 67 warrior has buffed

1031 def at 67 is puthetic.... lemme guess ur one of those berserk nubs <_<

Says the 56 with 900np.

[Aba]

personally I prefer the IN ....health>all