Sorry, but this is hogwash. People believe in the existence of atoms because it makes for a sound theory, with testable predictions. It may very well be wrong, and if it's shown to be so, people will get off the idea of atoms, and switch to a better theory. While not everyone may understand the intricacies of the theory, or why it is so, people will read a book and take it on authority. People will assume that the writer has researched what he is writing about, and that if he was wrong, a plethora of other writers would've stood up and corrected him. This is how science works. I have never been in space, but I have it on good authority that there's no air there. The same does not hold true for religion; the authority comes from "holy texts", and that is exactly what ubelievers find suspect.Originally posted by TunaFishyMe
The reason why you dont believe in religion is because you cant see it. *The reason why you dont believe in religion is because you think it cant be proven. *God cant exist because I dont see him. *God cant exist because I cant string a bunch of mathematical equations together and call it proof? *How many of you have actually seen an atom? *You read it in books and everything, but have you actually seen one? *As a second-year Electrical Engineering student, I havent. *Yet, you kids who are still struggling in highschool are telling me it has to be? *Have you seen 2 atoms bond? *have you seen with your own eyes intermolecular forces? *Why is it that you can take something so complicated and hold it as true but can't take something so simple like the belief in a god? *
Edit -- I'll put this in the same post, because it's relevant.
You take scientific results in textbooks on trust; you trust in the authority of the books. While you will not go out and test them (although you might, if you're interested enough), the results are certainly verifiable, and they have been verified, by different scientists around the globe. Not so for any holy text; nothing is verifiable, you either choose to believe in them, or you do not. The fact is that very few issues in science are as hotly debated as the existence of a deity (the closest we'd get is string theory, which according to some is akin to metaphysics). You don't take things in science on faith, you take them on authority; authority of other scientists, authority of their work, etc. Unbelievers find the authority of holy texts and institutions non-existant, and therefore do not believe in what they proclaim.What makes me wonder is how people always say the Bible is just a book, it isnt true. You dont believe its true because you havent seen it yourself. However, you are able to accept "science" as the truth just because you read it in your textbook. Have you actually seen the "evidence" science provides? I am not saying science is false, Im just saying you are able to take something so complicated and something you dont truly understand as facts but you feel that people who believe in something as simple as a god are crazy? That is the main point im trying to get at.
Bookmarks