I'm not going to bother arguing further because you argue like a child. You basically list a problem, add the fact that Obama happens to be president, and then draw a causality from that ignoring the fact that something called Congress exists and it's the same bunch of economists advising these administrations. You can't just cut taxes a bit and expect that to save institutions that will collapse within weeks without massive investment. That's just naive and why the current situation is completely different to recessions of the last 50 years. Jobs are being lost, it's terrible isn't it, and completely predictable because it's what happens during recessions. To have this fairytale idea that a republican administration (that openly declared it would support bailouts) could survive this climate without losing jobs by only cutting taxes, is absolutely ridiculous.
You don't analyse situations objectively. You basically think "republican = good, tax cuts = good, me likey" and every single argument you make is based on that, irrespective of its merits. And you refuse to accept the fact that the republicans already spent $700bn and probably would have spent more, like it never happened.
Bookmarks