Results 1 to 9 of 9

Congress Acting against P2P File Sharing...

This is a discussion on Congress Acting against P2P File Sharing... within the Off Topic forums, part of the Entertainment category; I found an article the other day. Anyone have anymore info about this? What are your thoughts? Here is the ...
Page: 1


  1. #1
    Senior Member BiSoNaToR's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    quitsville
    Posts
    65

    Default

    I found an article the other day. Anyone have anymore info about this?

    What are your thoughts?

    Here is the link to the article, http://www.wired.com/entertainment/m.../2004/03/62830 , I also pasted the article.

    Congress appears to be preparing assaults against peer-to-peer technology on multiple fronts.

    A draft bill recently circulated among members of the House Judiciary Committee would make it much easier for the Justice Department to pursue criminal prosecutions against file sharers by lowering the burden of proof. The bill, obtained Thursday by Wired News, also would seek penalties of fines and prison time of up to 10 years for file sharing.

    In addition, on Thursday, Sens. Orrin Hatch (R-Utah) and Patrick Leahy (D-Vermont) introduced a bill that would allow the Justice Department to pursue civil cases against file sharers, again making it easier for law enforcement to punish people trading copyright music over peer-to-peer networks. They dubbed the bill "Protecting Intellectual Rights Against Theft and Expropriation Act of 2004," or the Pirate Act.

    The bills come at a time when the music and movie industries are exerting enormous pressure on all branches of government at the federal and state levels to crack down on P2P content piracy. The industries also are pushing to portray P2P networks as dens of terrorists, child pornographers and criminals -- a strategy that would make it more palatable for politicians to pass laws against products that are very popular with their constituents.

    In defending the Pirate Act, Hatch said the operators of P2P networks are running a conspiracy in which they lure children and young people with free music, movies and pornography. With these "human shields," the P2P companies are trying to blackmail the entertainment industries into accepting their networks as a distribution channel and source of revenue.

    "Unfortunately, piracy and pornography could then become the cornerstones of a 'business model,'" Hatch said in a statement. The illicit activities of file sharers "then generate huge advertising revenues for the architects of piracy."

    The Recording Industry Association of America and the Motion Picture Association of America welcomed the Pirate Act.

    "I commend Sens. Patrick Leahy and Orrin Hatch for their vision and leadership in combating the theft of America's creative works," said Jack Valenti, MPAA's chief executive.

    "This legislation provides federal prosecutors with the flexibility and discretion to bring copyright-infringement cases that best correspond to the nature of the crime," said RIAA chairman and CEO Mitch Bainwol.

    So far in 2004, Leahy has received $178,000 in campaign contributions from the entertainment industries -- the second-biggest source of donations to Leahy behind lawyers. Hatch has received $152,360.

    The draft bill obtained by Wired News circulated among intellectual property subcommittee members in the House of Representatives. The document, titled "Closing the P2P loophole in 17.U.S.C. Section 506," was drafted in coordination with the Justice Department in response to concerns that federal prosecutors lack sufficient legal powers to go after serious abusers, people close to the matter said. They also said they believe Rep. Lamar Smith (R-Texas) is willing to propose the bill if he can find co-sponsors.

    If the draft becomes law, anyone sharing 2,500 or more pieces of content, such as songs or movies, could be fined or thrown in jail. In addition, anyone who distributes content that hasn't been released in wide distribution (for example, pre-release copies of an upcoming movie) also would face the penalties. Even a single file, determined by a judge to be worth more than $10,000, would land the file sharer in prison.

    Whether the leaked draft will be put forth as legislation remains unclear, and Smith's press secretary Christopher Chichester declined to comment.

    Smith has received almost $25,000 this year from the music, movie and TV industries.

    "This was not put together by our staff," said House Judiciary Committee spokesman Jeff Lungren. "But the intellectual property subcommittee is working on text to address the problem of digital piracy prosecutions, and it looks like this was one suggested iteration."

    In response, P2P United, an organization that represents software companies that run file-sharing networks, asked the subcommittee in a letter hand-delivered to Smith on Friday to put off enacting new laws aimed at punishing file sharers and instead explore ways in which copyright holders can be paid through P2P networks.

    "It's unfortunate that the entertainment industry devotes so much energy to supporting punitive efforts at the federal and state level, instead of putting energy into licensing their content for P2P distribution so those same people could be turned into customers," said Philip Corwin, an attorney with Butera and Andrews in Washington, D.C., who represents Kazaa distributor Sharman Networks. "The Pirate Act effectively gives government the authority to use taxpayer dollars to bring civil actions against file sharers on behalf of copyright holders."

    All these efforts by Congress to impose severe penalties are misguided, said P2P United executive director Adam Eisgrau.

    "As the 40 percent increase in downloads over the last year makes alarmingly clear, like it or not file sharing is likely to (continue) on a massive scale no matter how many suits are brought and what the fine print of copyright or criminal law says," Eisgrau said. "Second, putting a tiny percentage of tens of millions of American file sharers behind bars or in the poorhouse won't put one new dime in the deserving pockets of artists and other copyright owners."
    [/b]

  2. #2
    (\/) (;,,;) (\/) Why not Zoidberg? Admin camaz0tz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Somewhere between here and there
    Posts
    5,868

    Default

    im alet u in on a little secret

    http://www.wired.com/entertainment/music/news/2004/03/62830

    Congress Moves to Criminalize P2P
    Xeni Jardin Email 03.26.04

    notice the bold things? it means its from 2004...ur about 4 years too alte in noticing this

  3. #3
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    767

    Default

    Free porn and mp3s for everyone!1!!!1

  4. #4
    Senior Member Private's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    3,342

    Default

    dont be so harsh on em i thought the same not to long ago found a few recent articles and stumbled upon a old ass article and was convinced i needed to trash my harddrives and stash away my collection

    tbh i think something does need to be done just as far as actual prosecution goes its unacceptable cannot be putting kids away for downloading free mp3's the system the uk has put in place is something i think is awesome 3 strikes your out and i dont think after getting 2 strikes anyone would risk being prohibited from having internet service specially in this day and age

  5. #5
    TunaFishyMe
    Guest

    Default

    i wouldnt be surprised if you posted the article

  6. #6
    evilwevel
    Guest

    Default

    who needs P2P when you have rapidshare ?

    and i don't think they can stop P2P, i mean they would have to arrest 90 % of earth's population :lol:

  7. #7
    Banned
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Posts
    813

    Default

    BiSoNaToR

    View Member Profile
    Add as Friend
    Send Message
    Find Member's Topics
    Find Member's Posts Yesterday, 12:55 PM Post #1


    Member


    Group: Member +
    Posts: 47
    Joined: 14-March 07
    From: Ontario,Canada
    Member No.: 17,006
    Server: Olympia
    Clan: Jo
    IGN: Momma
    Nation: El Morad

  8. #8
    Senior Member Private's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    3,342

    Default

    klololololo

    and your more likely to do real time for rapid share then p2p fyi the only action taken agsinst p2p users in the us is basically bull shit which means they prosecute you with no evidence and is being ruled on in the supreme court i think

    downloading off of rapidshare is an actual risk if you ask me they could obtain real evidence when it comes to rapidshare

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    1,457

    Default

    So americans can't fileshare, so what. All the good shit comes from asia/russia anyway and they won't do anything about it.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •