Sick of flames?

[bknight]

Add flame baiting, elucid gave a nice example in this thread.
basically saying I can call someone a jew for being money hungry although it was really a compliment *cough*[/b]

its like fishing!

[loveya]

sarcastic idiotic posts - idiotic being the key, example: person 1: i sent 2 tickets and they were both closed! person 2: "OMG REALLY!?" wtf does that help?[/b]

whats wrong with this one, i like those.

the most thing that prob. gets me tho is

1st
2nd

and so on

[camaz0tz]

whats wrong with this one, i like those.

the most thing that prob. gets me tho is

1st
2nd

and so on[/b]

nothing wrong with sarcastic posts, as long as they have a point to them...sarcastic posts which have no point to them are just no different than trying to piss people off to start a flame war

[FornX]

Your stupid.

Hows that for a Flame?

t('-'t)

[david1641]

+1ing - if u agree with something, no one cares! if its already been said, we dont need u quoting it to be said again...if u want to add something new to the idea u can do so without sounding like a complete fucking idiot by adding a +1 to what they say, and please let it be something worth adding to the idea...if its just some idiotic idea like if someone were to reply to this post with "+1, and free hookers for the forum!!!!" give the homo a warn(not necessarily a mute or ban)[/b]

+1

i hate ppl that do that too <_<

[camaz0tz]

+1

i hate ppl that do that too <_<[/b]

hence why u JUST did it? :huh:

[Eric]

Leaving out valid flames such as things you&#39;ve said towards vandy when he said something retarded is fine, but when 3-4 of you all do it then it becomes ridiculous. Not to mention you flame people for one thing they&#39;ve done OVER and OVER.

Honestly the rules are set up already in a fashion where it&#39;s up to the staff to interpret them and honestly if people have such a problem with it, they can leave.

If Shurt wants to delve further into explaining the specifics of each rule he&#39;s welcome to, but I&#39;m not going do anything apart from give my opinion on it.

[camaz0tz]

Leaving out valid flames such as things you&#39;ve said towards vandy when he said something retarded is fine, but when 3-4 of you all do it then it becomes ridiculous. Not to mention you flame people for one thing they&#39;ve done OVER and OVER.

Honestly the rules are set up already in a fashion where it&#39;s up to the staff to interpret them and honestly if people have such a problem with it, they can leave.

If Shurt wants to delve further into explaining the specifics of each rule he&#39;s welcome to, but I&#39;m not going do anything apart from give my opinion on it.[/b]

then the forum just breaks down to mod bias and it breaks down to either 1 of 2 ways: mods get accused of power abuse and/or mods dont do anything at all, obviously the system intact is vastly flawed or people wouldnt be bitching about the huge amount of flaming going on

i still find it funny people blame the diez clique for the majority of flaming...we only post in off topic, media(like tv series etc), and ko4life section, 3 very small parts of the forum and we do barely any flaming within those sections, the majority of th eflaming that is ruining the forum is done in the general section, gamehelp section, media(like screenshots, sigs, etc) sections and guess what? obviously NOTHING is being done about them considering mods like felix are leaving because of such flaming

the one thing that stops mods from warning for flaming is one simple thing: what crosses the line of bad flaming? why not warn EVERYONE for flaming? because the world isnt perfect and not everyones going to have the perfectly same mind set so of course wires are going to get crossed and there will be negative posts, but the degree to which a negative post should be warned for should be set out, hence why i made this post, everyone else seems to agree its a good idea, but u dont for some very odd reason

adding specifics to rules isnt a bad thing, if anything its something that MUST be done, if theres uncertainty to rules then people will try to get away with things, if theres complete certainty to what a rule implies then people wont(unless they dont read the rules, but theyll surely catch on when they get warned and/or see others get warned for it)

[bknight]

cama&#39;s idea is the safest bet to prevent posts like this.

since when is it "cooler" to be playing at older ages? anyone over 30 playing ko i&#39;d consider a f4ggot...my two cents[/b]

dude you&#39;re a fu-ckin loser get a life, this game is for all ages you scrub so stfu and gtfo of thread, this doesnt concern u or whatever server u play

and all you can afford is 2 cents.. you are probably some 18 year old without a job borrowing money off of mommy to pay for your items on kol[/b]

[crackurbak]

I&#39;d say thats a good reply to a retarded comment about players ages!
he is standing up for almost 50%+ of the community, wheres the problem?
Augustus is the one at fault, not armageddon

[camaz0tz]

I&#39;d say thats a good reply to a retarded comment about players ages!
he is standing up for almost 50%+ of the community, wheres the problem?
Augustus is the one at fault, not armageddon[/b]

dude you&#39;re a fu-ckin loser get a life, this game is for all ages you scrub so stfu and gtfo of thread,[/b]

excessive swearing flames - OMG NOOB GTFO U FUCKING SUCK U COCK SUCKING FAGGOT WHORE MOTHER FUCKER KJASHDKJLASHDLKJASHDKJLASHDKLJAHDLK....ya u have the maturity of a 5 year old if u post like this, and seriously the forum doesnt need people of that maturity level

[crackurbak]

wasnt me who posted that. But the point is, his messege was a right one!
Im sure if he rephrased the swearing and shit people would have been more appreciative, and seriously, who the fuck doesnt swear nowdays?

[camaz0tz]

wasnt me who posted that. But the point is, his messege was a right one!
Im sure if he rephrased the swearing and shit people would have been more appreciative, and seriously, who the fuck doesnt swear nowdays?[/b]

who said swearing was bad?

[TheWorldWelivingIn]

yea i would totally agree to all this, so much unnecessary flaming happening.

@english.

some people might be making fun of the "lvl83" topics because of how many people flamed c-west people when we made our lvl 80 topics. just seems a bit hypocritical for them to make a bunch of 83 topics and yet complain when people make first lvl 80 topics for cwest.

cama you should add to the list when people say things like - no one care about you, or your dead server.

so many people say that about c-west.look in every like 2-3 page c-west topic and im sure theres like 5 of those posts.[/b]

you dont mean what you are sayng, becouse you are the one who has a mouth of a 5 year old = using bad language= you insult whit bad words if others dont think like you are thinking

[bknight]

yea thats exactly what i do.