Page 1 of 5 12345 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 74

1.6 vs css

This is a discussion on 1.6 vs css within the Counter-Strike forums, part of the Other category; which one is better? i have 1.6 and want to try css...
Page: 1


  1. #1
    GlassJaw
    Guest

    Default

    which one is better? i have 1.6 and want to try css

  2. #2
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    OVER THERE LOLZ -->>
    Posts
    447

    Talking

    I feel that CSS is slightly easier to play than 1.6, but of course you'll need at least a decent PC to play it well.

    I think the most obvious difference is the graphics, the game looks awesome with my widescreen monitor at 1440x900 with everything at max + custom skins etc.

    The hitboxes are slightly bigger so it's easier to hit someone.

    No cars :<

    Physics - it&#39;s fun to stack barrels and stuff in the corridors to block people

    A new radar which shows the map and where your team mates have spotted enemies

    Less hacks (from what I&#39;ve seen anyway)

    Built in bots (NOT AIMBOT LOL)

    A &#39;dynamic pricing&#39; thing which no one uses anyway lol

    Also, some of the self-proclaimed &#39;pros&#39; of 1.6 reckon that source "isn&#39;t competitive enough" for them. In other words they can&#39;t adapt to change lol, don&#39;t listen to them^^

    Here&#39;s a few screenies






  3. #3
    GlassJaw
    Guest

    Default

    Looks pretty cool i might buy it but i wanna see if i can try it out first

  4. #4
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    512

    Default

    Conin, it has nothing to do with their lack of being able to adapt to change.

    They are AGAIN professionals making money, so they&#39;ve clearly adapted.

    You can get better at 1.6 then you can at source. Steeper learning curve.

  5. #5
    nakanax
    Guest

    Default

    1.6 > css
    I got more fun in 1.6 than i ever had in css

  6. #6
    MacedonianSlayer
    Guest

    Default

    cs 1.6 is better thab css

  7. #7
    MacedonianSlayer
    Guest

    Default

    double post

  8. #8
    Senior Member Om3gaDeath's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Posts
    15

    Default

    1.6> css

    source over all better look of course

    but 1.6 has a better hitbox.

  9. #9
    stunna
    Guest

    Default

    1.6 for pros :]

  10. #10
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    512

    Default

    1.6> css

    source over all better look of course

    but 1.6 has a better hitbox.[/b]

    You should stop getting your information from forums filled with bullshit


    I played 1.6 for 6 years EASY.

    Now i went to source and the hitboxes are the same, if not better.

    Please know wtf ur saying before u open ur lips.

  11. #11
    Senior Member Shankz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    HELL
    Posts
    131

    Default

    ya, hitboxes in CSS are fine, a tab bit larger, so newbies can stand a chance though

    i would have to say CSS > 1.6

  12. #12
    fronzy
    Guest

    Default

    css for noobs who couldn&#39;t play 1.6 :P

  13. #13
    GlassJaw
    Guest

    Default

    graphics for css looks really sweet and 1.6 is getting kind of boring wish they should remake 1.6 with better graphics :lol:

  14. #14
    Banned
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Posts
    512

    Default

    css for noobs who couldn&#39;t play 1.6 :P[/b]

    That is the usual response for people who haven&#39;t played source to a full extent.

  15. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    I'm Your Neighbour
    Posts
    804

    Default

    Css for Gfx and nubs

    Cs 1.6 for tha pro&#39;s. Css is just spraying. i dont understand why some retarded nubs make movies of Css.


    Overall : Cs1.6(Skilled ppl) > Css(Sprayers)

Page 1 of 5 12345 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •