Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 59

new staffs from new expansion

This is a discussion on new staffs from new expansion within the Class Questions and Tips forums, part of the Game Questions & Tips category; these staffs look very nice with higher ap than hellblood/garp/elysium Love the dual elemental damage but the -70 AC is ...
Page: 1


  1. #1
    mrmagic2008
    Guest

    Default

    these staffs look very nice with higher ap than hellblood/garp/elysium
    Love the dual elemental damage but the -70 AC is a bit concerning

    i wonder if they will make the elixer, hell blood, garp,chaotic, oassis, eylsium,scorching staffs
    obsolete...

    Fire staffs:
    ----------------
    Undefeatable Fulitol +7
    Attack Power : 131
    Attack Speed : Very Slow
    Effective Range : 1.00
    Weight : 4.00
    Max Durability : 14000
    Current Durability : 14000
    Defense Ability : -70
    Flame Damage : 60
    Glacier Damage : 40
    Intelligence Bonus : 24
    Resistance to Flame : 34
    Required Magic Power : 139
    Unique

    Kaul Fulitol +7
    Attack Power : 131
    Attack Speed : Very Slow
    Effective Range : 1.00
    Weight : 4.00
    Max Durability : 14000
    Current Durability : 14000
    Defense Ability : -70
    Flame Damage : 60
    Glacier Damage : 40
    Intelligence Bonus : 24
    Resistance to Flame : 34
    Required Magic Power : 139
    Unique

    Aztec Gold Fulitol +7
    Attack Power : 131
    Attack Speed : Very Slow
    Effective Range : 1.00
    Weight : 4.00
    Max Durability : 14000
    Current Durability : 14000
    Defense Ability : -70
    Flame Damage : 60
    Glacier Damage : 40
    Intelligence Bonus : 24
    Resistance to Flame : 34
    Required Magic Power : 139
    Unique



    Glacier staffs
    ------------------
    Undefeatable Molok +7
    Attack Power : 131
    Attack Speed : Very Slow
    Effective Range : 1.00
    Weight : 4.00
    Max Durability : 14000
    Current Durability : 14000
    Defense Ability : -70
    Glacier Damage : 60
    Lightning Damage : 40
    Intelligence Bonus : 24
    Resistance to Glacier : 34
    Required Magic Power : 139
    Unique

    Kaul Molok +7
    Attack Power : 131
    Attack Speed : Very Slow
    Effective Range : 1.00
    Weight : 4.00
    Max Durability : 14000
    Current Durability : 14000
    Defense Ability : -70
    Glacier Damage : 60
    Lightning Damage : 40
    Intelligence Bonus : 24
    Resistance to Glacier : 34
    Required Magic Power : 139
    Unique

    Aztec Gold Molok +7
    Attack Power : 131
    Attack Speed : Very Slow
    Effective Range : 1.00
    Weight : 4.00
    Max Durability : 14000
    Current Durability : 14000
    Defense Ability : -70
    Glacier Damage : 60
    Lightning Damage : 40
    Intelligence Bonus : 24
    Resistance to Glacier : 34
    Required Magic Power : 139
    Unique


    light staffs
    -----------
    Undefeatable Faun +7
    Attack Power : 131
    Attack Speed : Very Slow
    Effective Range : 1.00
    Weight : 4.00
    Max Durability : 14000
    Current Durability : 14000
    Defense Ability : -70
    Glacier Damage : 40
    Lightning Damage : 60
    Intelligence Bonus : 24
    Resistance to Lightning : 34
    Required Magic Power : 139
    Unique

    Kaul Faun +7
    Attack Power : 131
    Attack Speed : Very Slow
    Effective Range : 1.00
    Weight : 4.00
    Max Durability : 14000
    Current Durability : 14000
    Defense Ability : -70
    Glacier Damage : 40
    Lightning Damage : 60
    Intelligence Bonus : 24
    Resistance to Lightning : 34
    Required Magic Power : 139
    Unique

    Aztec Gold Faun +7
    Attack Power : 131
    Attack Speed : Very Slow
    Effective Range : 1.00
    Weight : 4.00
    Max Durability : 14000
    Current Durability : 14000
    Defense Ability : -70
    Glacier Damage : 40
    Lightning Damage : 60
    Intelligence Bonus : 24
    Resistance to Lightning : 34
    Required Magic Power : 139
    Unique

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    2,293

    Default

    sucks shit, bifrost staff are still better

  3. #3
    El Gran Tanke Senior Member gimmecookiesnao's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    1,175

    Default

    where are those one hadnded staff people were talking bout?

  4. #4
    LegendarY Senior Member Lev0's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    The Netherlands//Turkey
    Posts
    2,582

    Default

    the staff sounds great but only the -70 ac
    that just sucks ass because mages already have a low to avarege ac

  5. #5
    tommyleonghk
    Guest

    Default

    eeww... -70AC

    no fukin way....maybe for exp but for PK, dont think so

    mages have way too low AC already

    well...unless the mage is fukin decked out with high AC...sure

  6. #6
    Foxy_Br
    Guest

    Default

    Its -70 AC sucks ass... You can see staffs for mages and bows for rogues with -AC, check warrior weapons wtf, high AP and dont have -AC... warriors pwnz

  7. #7
    MSZ - 006 Senior Member akutee's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Canada
    Posts
    3,948

    Default

    no matter how good the AP it isnt worth the -70 ac... pretty stupid imo.

    unless of course, the ap is like 200 or something.. then maybe its worth the - ac

  8. #8
    Augustus
    Guest

    Default

    uhh whats the difference between them????

  9. #9
    enigma69
    Guest

    Default

    for those of you complaining about -AC, i bet you choose imirs or flame rings+1 over rols.. practicly the same concept except its your staff not rings for more damage less tankage.

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    2,293

    Default

    for those of you complaining about -AC, i bet you choose imirs or flame rings+1 over rols.. practicly the same concept except its your staff not rings for more damage less tankage.[/b]

    That is the most stupidest comment I have ever heard.

  11. #11
    El Gran Tanke Senior Member gimmecookiesnao's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    1,175

    Default

    That is the most stupidest comment I have ever heard.[/b]
    but he has point.... lots of people sacrifice wat 60 ac? for lots more damage... so its not as stupid as one might think

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    2,293

    Default

    I just realized something, that staff doesn't require any INT at all...

    so technically you can wear it at lvl 20 and have negative AC?

    very unlikely.

    But if that is the case, I take my comment back. It is a very deadly weapon for paper mages.

    maxed out mp and max out hp with grade 1 build, pretty deadly.

    #1 glass canon

    complete mages would still probably use bifrost staff. only 70 AC >> 10 AP

  13. #13
    Senior Member dogbatter3's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    620

    Default

    I just realized something, that staff doesn't require any INT at all...

    so technically you can wear it at lvl 20 and have negative AC?

    very unlikely.

    But if that is the case, I take my comment back. It is a very deadly weapon for paper mages.

    maxed out mp and max out hp with grade 1 build, pretty deadly.

    #1 glass canon

    complete mages would still probably use bifrost staff. only 70 AC >> 10 AP[/b]
    well if u think about it, if u can make urself have negative ac, ppl cant hit u so i think ima just go hp +16 3int ears jewels and have no armours voot.. unless ofc they fixed this bug :S i know AFK on cwest found out how to do it already...

    and what do u mean mages have low ac? mages have more than rogues.. on cwest with only 1 piece +8 complete, rest +7, and helmet was +7 dd i had 1120 ac -_- so on an older server, you should be able to farm bf for better uniques / armours, to make up for the lost ac on these staffs.

    And to the person that asked what is the difference, heres a link to the official new patch site : http://www.knightonlineworld.com/forgotten...#cursed-weapons

    if you look at the bottom of the staffs in a SS, you will see somthin like posseses the power of "Nebiros" or somthin

  14. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    2,293

    Default

    Actually, Rogue always have more AC than Mages.

    and btw 70 AC for mage = roughly no boots / gloves, and you get 10 more ap than bifrost staff.

    good trade ? lol.

  15. #15
    Cadence96
    Guest

    Default

    no matter how good the AP it isnt worth the -70 ac... pretty stupid imo.[/b]
    That's how rogues feel since KE about new daggers with HP reduced.

Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •