Now THAT is a Signature
This is a discussion on time for a new sig within the Graphics forums, part of the Off Topic category; Now THAT is a Signature...
Page: 3
Now THAT is a Signature
see which version you prefer :P
nice nice but...whats the diff in each? lol i cant see it. ( i know im nub at the whole "art" thing...)
Nice one AmginE.
Can someone tell me the board's FF background color? Eyedropping doesn't seem to get the right one. I don't like making it transparent cos it mucks up some of the edges.
Ugh I forgot the board has two different styles to choose from >.< Now I'll try and make it transparent without messing up the quality.
server were down so i was bored :P
I know no one is asking me my opinion im just giving advices
I didnt like the background, size and font of ur sig my vagina friend, the center part where the render is looks really cool tho. The font color just doesnt blends in well and it could be a little bit bigger. The size of the sig (would look better if it was wider). About the background.. it just doesnt looks well :/
Necross ur sig looks good, the only bad thing is that the font color doesnt 'really' blends in too well and u could make it better
And well i think everyone agrees with me that the sig that LadyTorr made is absolutely impressive but the naab didnt make it transparent, it needs to be transparent to be good
I hope u understand what i mean
play with hue+saturation, gradient maps cuz the colors are terrible, sorry and the typo sux
see which version you prefer :P[/b]
maybe dont use so much linear, color burn (dunno if its there but it looks like it is)
Testing..
This is the .gif:
Ugh.. came out ugly if you view the forum in the "Jet" style. If you view it in the IPB Default Skin style then it looks alright..
This is the .png:
On some browsers, the png's transparency is replaced by another color, but on others it comes out transparent.
This is so much easier on the official USKO forum cos there's only one style, and the background colors don't change every second post so I can just use an eyedropper in a .bmp lol.
use blur on that C4D maybe on whole sig
and about transparent background, simply delete the main background, it will be transparent (if you set it like that in PS) and then save in in png
That's what I did. Apparently the transparency only shows on IE8 or something.and about transparent background, simply delete the main background, it will be transparent (if you set it like that in PS) and then save in in png[/b]
Blur the edges dude
play with hue+saturation, gradient maps cuz the colors are terrible, sorry and the typo sux
maybe dont use so much linear, color burn (dunno if its there but it looks like it is)[/b]
what do you see wrong with the colors? (and im seriously asking, i still havent learned this part of sig making, apparently). and i know the text is kinda bad but i coulndt think of anything to do with such a long name -_-
They dont look good
its too contrast i think, i think that you should put some flow and the colors should scream so much, they shouldnt be so agresive i thinkwhat do you see wrong with the colors? (and im seriously asking, i still havent learned this part of sig making, apparently). and i know the text is kinda bad but i coulndt think of anything to do with such a long name -_-[/b]
also depth would be good, the most easiest depth is made by bluring everything except focal point
try to focus on those things
Bookmarks