Which do you like better?
This is a discussion on Lorad of the rings(1,2,3) or 300 within the Movies forums, part of the General Entertainment category; Which do you like better?...
Page: 1
Which do you like better?
u cannot compare these movies imo
its 3 movies vs 1 with so much diference
imo lotr
i´ve same opinion...
u cannot advise these movies cuz lotr is trilogy movie and 300 is single movie, u can compare movies like > lotr vs matrix, trilogy vs trilogy, single / single :>
but if i must choice in those possibilities i choose lotr
3>1
i find lotr movies really long and boring. They changed so many things and it just got boring. I rather 300 :P
I liked both.
But I didn't like the end of 300 it was so unexpected ect.
So I go with Lord of the Rings
300 was just all about fights with way too many visual effects, lacked in story. But lord of the rings.... u can't even compare both of them.
ofc lord of the rings dude the best movies evah.
lotr ftw!
lotr > 300
mainly cuz lotr aint all about blood like a manga comic :P
You should've attended history lessons, that it wouldn't have surprised you that they fell.I liked both.
But I didn't like the end of 300 it was so unexpected ect.
So I go with Lord of the Rings [/b]
KaZaM , he aint got a brain but still, u cant compare them :P
cmon ^^ 300 wasnt even about acting, just computer effects, 80% of movie was about killing and blood :P
300, shorter and it's get to the point quicker.
LOTR 1/2/3 all was nice... but you know the next movie....
this is the first 300 movie... if there is 300 II I expect him to be much less better than the current one.
i liked them both too,
tonight we should dine in hell !
its just an other movie, so its hard to compare!
some of the lotr movies won academy awards....
not to mention return of the king is one of the 3 most money grossing films of all times with the others being titanic and pirates of carribean 2
Bookmarks