which is basically what I said, except you used the word focusing, whereas I used the correct term of tending :P
This is a discussion on X : 0 = infinity ? within the Off Topic forums, part of the Entertainment category; which is basically what I said, except you used the word focusing, whereas I used the correct term of tending ...
Page: 2
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
which is basically what I said, except you used the word focusing, whereas I used the correct term of tending :P
of course devide by 0 is undefined , but free ur mind...
just read what i said .
of course devide by 0 is undefined , but free ur mind...
just read what i said .
do u want the answer to get as closest at possible to 0 or the dividing number as closest to 0?
do u want the answer to get as closest at possible to 0 or the dividing number as closest to 0?
חרשן!!!h43r:
חרשן!!!
dividing number of course...Originally posted by FatM4n
do u want the answer to get as closest at possible to 0 or the dividing number as closest to 0?
im talking about getting close to divide by 0 .
anyway bumpit
You can divide numbers by 0, but they are in the unreal numbers system, which does exist, it just doesn't exist. You knowits a third dimension to numbers
its a limit. 8/x where x appraches 0. so it approaches infinity.
i'd like to know what other ppl think as well...
well
as the
number here/divides with a number as close as 0
then the dividing number will "fit" mroe times in the larger number
I think it's logicall that dividing with a number as close as to 0 will generate a big number
nothing special about it
A googolplex (a 1 with a googol zeroes) is as far from the number 1 as it is from infinity..
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks